DON JR.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
I don't think we're waiting on anything other than the DC occupation to end. Everyone should really read the 11.3 marker from the DoD document that Q called "the biggest advance drop on pol" it outlines EVERYTHING and explains the ~4 ways the military occupation there could end.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190
Interesting theory, but who's the occupier? The military or the DC swamp? It looks to me like the occupied territory is Washington DC and the occupying power is the National Guard called from these different states.
So when all the governors recall their National Guard troops back home, marker 11.3 will be met, and the show will begin?
The DoD war manual says that the 4 ways occupation ends are:
1: The occupying power leaves the territory
2: The local population rises up against the belligerent power and loosens it's control over the territory as a result
3: The hostility between the people and the occupying power disappears, or the local people elect a new government that consents to the Occupying Power being there
4: A peace treaty is signed between the people and the Occupying Power, thereby making the Occupying Power legitimate
If the occupying power is the National Guard, that would mean Team Q is waiting for #1 to happen. I don't see #2, 3 or 4 ever being satisfied.
https://www.fox5dc.com/news/nearly-2300-national-guard-personnel-will-stay-in-dc-through-may-23-dod
Looks like they aren't leaving anytime soon. What do you think? Or am I completely wrong about the National Guard being the occupying power?
It was probably both our troops and the Taliban/Al Qeada