What is the validity of this claim? Seems like a stretch
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (146)
sorted by:
'Matt Couch' ( you misspelled his name) has no legitimate press credentials'
so who is this 'legitimate press' you speak of?
Indeed, I misspelled his name.
And really, after all that, you think one paltry question somehow throws a spanner in the works? That's it? That's your checkmate?
You might have heard a rumour I'm starting a sportsbook. If you're happy to bet on your lame horse I'm willing to pay you at a rate of 10:1 if he crosses the finish line. No refunds on your highly likely loss - store policy.
no, if I was trying for a 'checkmate', it was; you thinking there are some kind of 'press credentials' that would make him more trustworthy...you didn't answer why that matters?
I have no desire to have a debate of semantics over this one question given everything I presented. It is your freedom to have your own opinion and bet on Couch Potato. If you have anything of substance to lend weight to his character or that his bedroom news desk provides serious truths, then let's see it.
Given all presented, if you think somehow there isn't enough in there to make an educated guess that he maybe, just maybe, might be full of shit because the MSM is full of shit themselves and that somehow makes him a bastion of truth... well... that's why I'd like to offer people like you this exclusive deal of 10:1 odds. :)