Wow, this is a very thorough ecological study. Stats fans will appreciate the efforts and cross checks and lack of agenda. It's very encouraging that Nature journal put this out. The American counterpart, Science, has been too busy all year with their new social consciousness program.
tldr, the effects of staying at home are very minimal in reducing spread. Peru had the most severe lockdown and worst spread. Lack of lockdown wasn't the reason for Sweden's deaths. I think this article is way too technical for regular redpilling, but it is a goldmine of references.
I brought this up during a conversation the other night along with the CDC admitting last week that the masks did nothing and it got quiet really fast, despite none of these people wearing masks at the party (at least some progress there for some sheeple) they still were showing a lot of difficulty getting over the revelations that all of the BS of the past year had been for nothing.
Wow, this is a very thorough ecological study. Stats fans will appreciate the efforts and cross checks and lack of agenda. It's very encouraging that Nature journal put this out. The American counterpart, Science, has been too busy all year with their new social consciousness program.
tldr, the effects of staying at home are very minimal in reducing spread. Peru had the most severe lockdown and worst spread. Lack of lockdown wasn't the reason for Sweden's deaths. I think this article is way too technical for regular redpilling, but it is a goldmine of references.
Well we knew they don't work from the beginning
I brought this up during a conversation the other night along with the CDC admitting last week that the masks did nothing and it got quiet really fast, despite none of these people wearing masks at the party (at least some progress there for some sheeple) they still were showing a lot of difficulty getting over the revelations that all of the BS of the past year had been for nothing.