Positive identification microchip?
(archive.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Stop with what crap? Can you point me to the references you mention?
Is Gail Riplinger a bad author? This is the first I’ve read by her.
https://youtu.be/BVXjw4jd61M
A critique of the book by a Christian apologist with hundreds of moderated debates defending the faith under his belt.
Thank you, I’ll check it out tonight, mind open. It does look like a lot of things in the book are taken out of context with a lot of ... between quotes.
I just want to make sure the Bible I’m reading contains the closest thing to the true word of God.
He said "Heaven and Earth will pass away, but my word will never pass away". His promises are always kept. the Word isn't going anywhere :)
Also beware King James Onlyism. I used to be one. Transmission of text is of course important.
If you want more sources let me know.
Jesus is Lord, God and King.
Thanks. I watched 4 of the videos you linked and see why you said “Ugh” about her... it really sounds like she took most everything out of context to make her points.
As for King James Only-ism, I have been looking into both sides of that debate a tiny bit, and it sounds like the original sources either types (KJV source vs NIV,NSB,etc) used have claims against their accuracy.
But the gist I get from non-KJV only people is that pretty much all of the commonly accepted translations have the same basic messages and lessons and instructions.
Let’s say KJVonlyism didn’t exist. Would the KJV be considered a good version to read as long as the reader makes the effort to understand it?
What is your opinion on parallel bibles as a way of expanding your understanding?