On its own as a Q post using the above in isolation for that ‘decode’ is tenuous at best.... but when we consider the context of that Q post and the tolerances in sending a tweet at exactly that time (so as to relate to a specific Q post aggregator number....) is almost impossible as Q often admitted when relating Q posts to Q+/ POTUS TWATS relative to time stamps of either Q posts and the relevant post/Link outside the QRB at actually time of sending the post.... Q admitted that there was always the possibility of few seconds of either one being out sync.... so if you allow a second or two between the time stamps you are then increasing the possibility that the time, the exact time could be out by a Q post or more....therefore making it certain for the sender, that they would not be able to get the exact Q post number necessary for comparison with the time stamp of the message itself.....

So with that in mind I would argue that the ‘decode’ above does not stand up as a proof let alone a direct message to us ‘now’ .... simply because no one could be certain of an exact time down to seconds.... no matter who, including Q....

WWG1WGA