I mean 17?!?! Really? Coincidence?!?! No such thing ?.
So, am I missing a rational, obvious explanation for this number assigned to the UK variant? Or is it as it seems to me?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Who knows? It's a fair question. Maybe it is something but I reckon it'd be a coincidence. We'll see. More likely it'll be pumping up strain numbers again or a codename for some hyper-deadly variant nobody can confirm but totes exists according to "the science".
When did science become guys in labcoats saying "Dude, trust me"?
?. It’s as persuasive as “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
Ummm ... I don’t think so!!