I mean 17?!?! Really? Coincidence?!?! No such thing ?.
So, am I missing a rational, obvious explanation for this number assigned to the UK variant? Or is it as it seems to me?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
It's getting hard to keep up now. There's so many remixes and new strains according to our propaganda outlets.
There was the Chy-na Virus, of course. But it's racist to call it that apparently.
But don't forget about that dirty South African and especially dirty UK strain. That's OK apparently.
Not long ago apparently India is a right hotbed that gave birth to 240 new strains. Bizarre we as a society know so little regarding the original yet 240 have been identified in the wild, in a single country no less.
Link: https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/india-coronavirus-240-new-covid-strains-found-as-cases-suddenly-surge/news-story/96c21b64343c9627938cb551275cef98
Sounds like total bullshit to me. Maybe some article will come out saying they found 874 new strains throughout Europe to fill in the blanks?
It honestly wouldn't surprise me.
I just saw the “17” and saw “Q.” Perhaps I am being too simple.
Who knows? It's a fair question. Maybe it is something but I reckon it'd be a coincidence. We'll see. More likely it'll be pumping up strain numbers again or a codename for some hyper-deadly variant nobody can confirm but totes exists according to "the science".
When did science become guys in labcoats saying "Dude, trust me"?
?. It’s as persuasive as “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
Ummm ... I don’t think so!!