Gradual means incremental, and fast and slow are all relative. That which takes tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of years is both slow or fast, gradual or rapid, entire based on it's context.
If your argument is Darwin is wrong because it isn't ALWAYS 'slow' then fine, no one cares. Darwin was wrong about a ton of things. Evolution isn't married to Darwin's description of it.
If those transitional species actually existed they would die and leave fossils just like anything else
It's a numbers game. If you're looking for something that existed in small relative numbers for a short period of time it's going to be overwhelmed by species that have established themselves in greater numbers in those same layers.
Transitional fossils are nice, but you're asking the impossible to demand those in an explosion. "Sure, we have transitional fossils for all sorts of other cases... but you don't have them for this that or the other things, checkmate" ... WRONG
all the current evidence refutes the theory of gradual evolution and points strongly and convincingly towards purposeful design by a creator.
That's an outright lie. There is zero evidence. Demanding x or else it must not be so isn't "evidence". Provide one piece of evidence that argues against evolution.
Gradual means incremental, and fast and slow are all relative. That which takes tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of years is both slow or fast, gradual or rapid, entire based on it's context.
If your argument is Darwin is wrong because it isn't ALWAYS 'slow' then fine, no one cares. Darwin was wrong about a ton of things. Evolution isn't married to Darwin's description of it.
If those transitional species actually existed they would die and leave fossils just like anything else
It's a numbers game. If you're looking for something that existed in small relative numbers for a short period of time it's going to be overwhelmed by species that have established themselves in greater numbers in those same layers.
Transitional fossils are nice, but you're asking the impossible to demand those in an explosion. "Sure, we have transitional fossils for all sorts of other cases... but you don't have them for this that or the other things, checkmate" ... WRONG
That's an outright lie. There is zero evidence. Demanding x or else it must not be so isn't "evidence". Provide one piece of evidence that argues against evolution.