Well this may not be the most popular opinion. But if anyone knows me, they know I don't give a fuck about being popular. I was very impressed with Hoback's DoQumentary so far.
Might it be a huge bait and switch? Flipping into the race card? Or violence? Or some super-hidden group of insurrectionists? Maybe...
But at this point in the series Hoback has managed to avoid most* of the MSM pitfalls and lazy narrative ploys. I am impressed (even with the 2nd episode). I appreciated his dive into the personas of those closest to Q's platform of choice.
While I am still expecting this is ultimately be a hit piece, if Hoback somehow manages to maintain this level of neutrality throughout all 6 parts, this would be a MASSIVE red pill.
Q the Wakeup? I hope so!
More Anti-Q fear-porn? I hope not.
Only time will tell! But, so far I am very impressed with Cullen Hoback and I see why the Watkins' would have allowed for this interview.
Meh.
No mention of James Alefantis or David Brock or their close ties to Pizzagate. Nor the connection to Weinstein and Hollywood which is very important. Harvey was not mentioned at all. Alefantis is also a Rothschild, which was not mentioned either. HBO is trying to run interference on the real people that are responsible. Plus no mention of Soros, Pelosi, Schumer, and very little on the Podesta brothers. Nothing on the Podesta art collection nor the Madeline Mc Cain suspect drawings that closely resembled John and Tony Podesta, and the third drawing of a female that matches Ghislaine Maxwell. IMO this is deflection. HBO is not our friend.
I agree with you on the surface, but, this is a documentary exploring the Q phenomenon for normies... it's intent was not to expose Pizzagate. You can't throw out the entire series because the creator didn't follow a tangential topic based on your opinion.
I think (hope?) the purpose or reaction to this will be that people do their own digging. If this happens, even with 10-20% of the audience. Massive winnings.
You can’t have Q without Pizzagate, Weinstein, Maxwell, Royals or Epstein. Hollywood is a huge part of the puzzle.
I understand all of that. I was DL'ing and diving into the PG leaks on minute zero. I was hot on the trail of the Pegasus Museum.
My point is, the documentary does not need to go into that avenue at this time. We should be thankful that it's waking people up and getting them to look into things more.
Not wishing that it spent more time on one aspect of the overarching conspiracy.
Thanks to Epstein, Weinstein, Price Andrew, Clinton, etc... people are already waking up to this (for the most part)... assuming that great care is being taken not to drop the child sacrifice stuff too early and panic/scare people away from the truth.
Agreed. But, the documentary is exploring Q, not Pizzagate.
That would be like dismissing a documentary about the Federal Reserve because it didn't expose Jeffrey Epstein.