No, this only applies to government mandates. Private property/business owners can set whatever conditions of employment they want, unless politicians say otherwise as an infringement of their property rights.
Also, taxation without consent is theft/extortion. Just like sex without consent is rape. A boxing match without consent is assault.
If they have an EIN they are claiming to be "an agency or instrumentality of the US government" - or possibly the State government. That's the definition of an "employer". And when it comes to sexual harassment the EEOC would apply. It should apply to this example as well.
No, this only applies to government mandates. Private property/business owners can set whatever conditions of employment they want, unless politicians say otherwise as an infringement of their property rights.
Also, taxation without consent is theft/extortion. Just like sex without consent is rape. A boxing match without consent is assault.
If they have an EIN they are claiming to be "an agency or instrumentality of the US government" - or possibly the State government. That's the definition of an "employer". And when it comes to sexual harassment the EEOC would apply. It should apply to this example as well.