A more apt interpretation is that Sidney seeks to have the jurisdiction moved to North Texas, understanding full well that the DC Circuit is never going to dismiss outright.

Her arguments as to this being protected speech are two-fold; that it was political speech, which is protected, and that the language used around political speech is expected to be inexact and vituperative.

She lays out an excellent case here, and set it up perfectly for appeal if and when the DC Circuit completely steamrolls "the law" and just does whatever the fuck they want, as usual.

Eventually, this response will lay the groundwork for her victory and Dominions' demise.