She writes, in very correct legal terms, that the words are not actionable because no reasonable person (reasonable has a legal definition here, not a colloquial one) would believe that these were statements of fact. Rather, that they were claims to be tested through the courts. Thus they can not be considered defamatory.
Of course, the MSM, just like they did Trump's Georgia phone call, take certain phrases out of context, knowing that the lazy leftists reading their trash aren't going to make the effort to call them out on their bullshit.
Try actually reading Sydney's statement for one.
She writes, in very correct legal terms, that the words are not actionable because no reasonable person (reasonable has a legal definition here, not a colloquial one) would believe that these were statements of fact. Rather, that they were claims to be tested through the courts. Thus they can not be considered defamatory.
Of course, the MSM, just like they did Trump's Georgia phone call, take certain phrases out of context, knowing that the lazy leftists reading their trash aren't going to make the effort to call them out on their bullshit.
Damn, beat me to it! :D