Hmm...I'm not sure attacking GRAS is really the way to begin this fight. That's one of the few things I actually think the FDA gets right. If people have been eating it safely in other countries for thousands of years, I think we should be able to consume it here as well without spending a million dollars on safety studies.
How about just better enforcement so that people can't abuse the system.
Because I strongly support Trump and this war we are in to defeat the evil that has taken over the planet.
But Trump is objectively wrong on this.
Now, it could all be part of the movie. We all know Israel is being saved for last, and Massie is the only Congressman with the principles to refuse AIPAC money. Trump may be attacking him to save him for later. When the truth about Israel comes out and Trump is forced to take one for the team, Massie, as Trump's enemy, may not be thrown out with the bathwater.
But if this is genuine, Trump is flat out wrong to attack a patriotic American who votes his principles. If every Congressman was like Massie, we wouldn't even be in this mess. Trump is there to attack those working against America, not those who love America and try to lead by example rather than psyops.
Trump is in the position he is to defeat the deep state globalists. Massie hates the globalists just as much as we do. The fact that he wants to remain true to his principles and doesn't want to play a role in this war does not mean Trump should declare him the enemy.
If there had been mandatory cuts in that CR, Massie would have voted yes. Trump had many options. Yes, Trump created the wedge.
Disagree.
I wouldn't be surprised however, if it turned out that Trump was doing this to raise Massie's stature as a unifying candidate for the next election. Trump can never bring America together because of his history and the visceral hatred many have for him. Someone else will need to lead that healing effort.
I can think of no candidate better than Massie, who has always voted on principle, and never taken a single dollar of AIPAC money. He genuinely represents America without being part of the espionage war we're living through.
But in any case, Trump is supposed to be fighting the deep state globalists, not American politicians who genuinely represent OUR values. But whether or not there is a movie aspect to this event, it is undeniable that it is Trump who is responsible for this division. And if there's a reconciliation to be made, Trump is going to have to walk it back, because Massie isn't going anywhere.
None of that implies I won't support Trump in his effort to defeat the globalists. But this attack against Massie isn't that.
The problem is, who's driving the wedge?
I like Trump. Voted for him 3 times. But he's wrong to go after Massie. Massie is not a deep state puppet. Trump has created a wedge where no wedge needs to be.
I voted for Trump to fight the deep state globalists, not principled Congressmen who are trying to lead by example. If anyone is trying to split MAGA, it isn't Massie.
If every congressman voted their conscience the way Massie does, we wouldn't be in this mess where the globalists cabal has taken control of our country.
Say what you will about Massie, but he's leading by example. I have a lot of respect for the guy. He doesn't fight Trump because he's someone else's puppet. Everything he does is done on principle.
Trump is wasting a lot of political capital and dividing MAGA on something that is even less popular than his shilling of the experimental, mutagenic jab during the Covid era.
This is where I part ways with Ron Paul and the Libertarians. There's no reality where everyone can just do anything they like, harming the majority of American people, with no control at all.
Economics is just like war. If foreigners came marching into our land and shooting people, would that be OK? If not, then why is it OK for foreigners to come into our land, undercut our manufacturing base and steal all our jobs?
Maybe in a different time, where people were mostly independent and resiliency was the order of the day, the economy wouldn't be so critical to survival. But in the world we live in today, cheap foreign labor and goods are just as deadly to our ability to survive as a bullet.
The Libertarian philosophy is not OK in this instance.
That's a ridiculously high percentage between 64 and 67. The total number dead should only be around 8.5%, or about 45 people.
You can check the actuarial tables at SSA:
While I would prefer no AI at all, I hope that human culture with AI will evolve to value the extra free time granted by it as a way to pursue better health and food. That includes humans in the future placing cultural importance, not just financial value, on growing their own food. I would welcome the day peers and neighbors were impressed by the produce from our gardens rather than the size of our McMansions. Call me a dreamer, but I have hope that Trump's "the best is yet to come" means something more than just economics and technology. The culture of America needs to be rebuilt before fixing anything else the globalists destroyed.
It used to be that math students would pride themselves on how quickly they could do complex arithmetic and square roots in their head. Upon the invention of calculators, that human skill was lost. Now, almost nobody practices that, because calculators are ubiquitous and there simply is no need.
The same thing is going to happen to other academic skills now the AI is available. Humans aren't going to need to know how to use proper grammar or spell, or memorize historical events, or skim research papers. All of that, just like doing complex arithmetic in your head, will be lost and unnecessary in future generations. They will have an AI at their command to handle that.
Education will have to adjust, just like math departments adjusted to the reality of calculators. Different skills will be required, such as how to prompt and communicate effectively with your AI to get the answers you need.
It's not that easy. If they were to excessively devalue the Euro, Pound, Swiss Frank, etc. they would simply cause inflation and currency collapse. There's no demand for it internationally.
The USD is still high in demand because of its status in international trade. So you can devalue that and export that inflation around the entire world where it isn't concentrated in Europe. It's the dilution ability that makes it so valuable.
So if Trump has control of the Fed, he can leverage the USD's commercial status to play financial games they can't match.
It's very likely he had some kind of criminal record in his home country which would have prevented him from getting an immigrant visa to the USA even with the marriage. K1's, IR1's, etc. are not guaranteed, and while you can change status inside the country if you are here legally, you can't if you entered illegally. You have to leave and come back with a valid visa.
I honestly don't think I'm underestimating the evil of these people, but having not seen it I can't say that with authority.
As for what God desires, I'll believe it when He tells me. I'm not going to speculate. I'll follow my intuition until then.
Without getting into details, my life experience has shown me God has an amazing way of making His intentions manifest when it's important.
Given one of the supposed measles deaths wasn't even a result of the measles, but instead was due to pulminary failure since the child had both measles and pneumonia due to RSV, it seems this is definitely another Covid ploy. The fact that hospitals are misrepresenting the cause of death and RFK isn't saying a thing means nothing has changed.
We're still stuck in the same psyop we've been in since 2020, and individual human suffering and collateral damage as a result of their games must not be considered relevant.
100% exactly the opposite. Tell me the truth. No human understands the true nature of God, so it would be ridiculous to get upset if my current thought is wrong.
Maybe all Church's do need to be destroyed. If so, then let them be destroyed. Tell humanity the truth, and let the chips fall as they may.
But neither you, Q nor anyone else gets to decide what I can or can't handle. I want the cold hard truth. All of it. I have complete faith that whatever happens after that is what God desires, not what some human thinks God desires.
End of humanity? Probably not. Dangerous outcomes? Absolutely.
To be terrorism there has to be a threat...an asymmetry of violence in order to realize a change in policy or culture. This is just poor values by a segment of humanity. They aren't threatening. They just believe "technological progress" is more important.
Don't worry though. AI as implemented today lacks intent. It can't out maneuver it's operators on its own volition. It has to be fed a prompt, from which it predicts the next word or event. It has no awareness, sense of self, or need to exist. Terminator is still just fiction unless someone commands it and gives it the authority and resources to proceed.
It's a dangerous tool for sure in the wrong hands. But ultimately, it is still just a tool, and I don't see any way you put the genie back in the bottle without a reset of technology across the planet, or an ascension of humanity which resets human priorities. The biggest genuine threat AI offers is the destruction of jobs because human labor no longer offers economic value, leading to widespread poverty and lack of purpose. And that is certainly dangerous.
In any case, you can't stop AI by treaties.
Telling me that 60% will remain hidden "for humanity".
He's doing a very poor impersonation of Jack Nicholson.
I neither want nor need Q on that wall, and I can handle the truth. Only God gets to make decisions for all of humanity. No human has that right. That is not Q's job, and this is the one drop which makes my blood boil.
This is not right.
This was always the drop that I hated. It's the thorn that makes me skeptical of the movement. Who is Q to decide the fate of humanity, or how much we should know/can tolerate?
Is Q elevating himself to the status of God?
Q doesn't get to decide that. Let it all out, and let the chips fall where they may. This idea that Q is our keeper is unacceptable.
Why would he sign one now when he wouldn't a few days ago? Trump's position is not going to change. Is he conceding defeat?
America is never agreeing to anything that would obligate us to participate in a war against Russia. Never.
I think there was a lot more to that meeting than people are seeing. The day after "Phase 1" begins, we see this apparently staged, heated argument between Zelensky and Trump/Vance, where Trump repeatedly tells Zelensky he doesn't "have the cards". But Trump does. So when do you play the Trump card?
The one real thing about the Ukraine war has always been the people that are dying. I think what we were told in that meeting is that the dying is just getting started. To me, it is looking more and more like this is the vehicle they are going to use to bring on the precipice, and that dying is not going to be limited to Ukrainians.
Why do I immediately think of the Deep Space 9 episode ("Past Tense, Season 3, ep. 11 & 12) when I read this.
Unfortunately, before we could do this, we'd need to first make our public officials and police accountable to those people they are "arresting." And the taxpayers would have to accept that this solution won't be cheap.
Doesn't matter. At this point, Trump is going to do whatever he's going to do. All the pieces for the movie are in place. What you and I think is no longer relevant, and he doesn't need us to be a unified block. So honestly, it really is time to grab the popcorn and wait.