Judging by the article, it seems like she's going to try to dismiss this lawsuit against her and let them go after Mike Lyndell?
I'm no lawfag, and I can't follow these proceedings clearly, but there's one thing I can't ignore about the election fraud case, and I can't see how any "fraud deniers" can either.... Why would thousands of people sign legally-binding affidavits attesting to fraud occurring (to their knowledge)? Would the Deep State ever allow so many of their ranks to be bound by law to the point where they could be jailed for inaccuracies?
These court games are surely as interesting to me as they are incomprehensible, but that's why I'm here..
Judging by the article, it seems like she's going to try to dismiss this lawsuit against her and let them go after Mike Lyndell?
I'm no lawfag, and I can't follow these proceedings clearly, but there's one thing I can't ignore about the election fraud case, and I can't see how any "fraud deniers" can either.... Why would thousands of people sign legally-binding affidavits attesting to fraud occurring (to their knowledge)? Would the Deep State ever allow so many of their ranks to be bound by law to the point where they could be jailed for inaccuracies?
These court games are surely as interesting to me as they are incomprehensible, but that's why I'm here..