This is how the law works. Powell's attorney wrote that statement to reiterate the law here. Dominion must prove Powell's statements about their machines are false. How are going to do this?
An attorney such as Powell with her career and reputation at stake does not make statements if she has no evidence. Clearly, she has massive evidence! How will Dominion refute this evidence?
Powell has already had some machine programinng audits done! Plus the videos out there from Dominion admitting to 'manual user manipulation' while 'lobbying' to local/state officials in a bid to purchase their machines. Add to that the numerous 'machine glitches' videos reported after the elections and all the witnesses that have come forth with their affidavits (signed under penalty of perjury), which further reinforces Powell's claims! These affidavits and actual/physical machine audits are not concentrated to just one voting district or state. As Powell said early on; (so telling); 'it's in their manual' and this one; 'it's systemic.' Meaning, these machines across the country and not just swing states, it's in all the states Dominion machines were used. (I think she said at least 18 states--could be more). And how about all the Dominion employees that quit right after the election and these allegations became public?
So tell me, how will Dominion's attorneys try to manipulate or twist the written law to their advantage? (think like Dominion's attorneys argument).
This is how the law works. Powell's attorney wrote that statement to reiterate the law here. Dominion must prove Powell's statements about their machines are false. How are going to do this?
An attorney such as Powell with her career and reputation at stake does not make statements if she has no evidence. Clearly, she has massive evidence! How will Dominion refute this evidence?
Powell has already had some machine programinng audits done! Plus the videos out there from Dominion admitting to 'manual user manipulation' while 'lobbying' to local/state officials in a bid to purchase their machines. Add to that the numerous 'machine glitches' videos reported after the elections and all the witnesses that have come forth with their affidavits (signed under penalty of perjury), which further reinforces Powell's claims! These affidavits and actual/physical machine audits are not concentrated to just one voting district or state. As Powell said early on; (so telling); 'it's in their manual' and this one; 'it's systemic.' Meaning, these machines across the country and not just swing states, it's in all the states Dominion machines were used. (I think she said at least 18 states--could be more). And how about all the Dominion employees that quit right after the election and these allegations became public?
So tell me, how will Dominion's attorneys try to manipulate or twist the written law to their advantage? (think like Dominion's attorneys argument).