and with it aground could it be necessary to unload all or majority of containers to increase buoyancy? and could it then be required the containers be inspected as a normal course of transfers? hopeful thinking, but something has got to break soon
Apparently they will need to resort to that if their current efforts of digging and tugboats fail
If tugboats and diggers aren't enough to free the vessel, then they only other option is to starting removing weight - either by dumping fuel or unloading cargo, piece by piece.
quite the dilemma. they must have cranes/booms on the ship so I'd get a smaller length ship in there that won't get stuck to load em onto it if feasible or they may just jettison them over the edge. perhaps attaching floats and tying them off to a cable attached to a strong piece of equipment on shore that can pull em on shore
What’s in the containers?
trafficked children perhaps? now wouldn't that be eye opening!
and with it aground could it be necessary to unload all or majority of containers to increase buoyancy? and could it then be required the containers be inspected as a normal course of transfers? hopeful thinking, but something has got to break soon
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9396611/Suez-Canal-blocked-cargo-ship-Given-runs-aground.html
Apparently they will need to resort to that if their current efforts of digging and tugboats fail
thanks for that
quite the dilemma. they must have cranes/booms on the ship so I'd get a smaller length ship in there that won't get stuck to load em onto it if feasible or they may just jettison them over the edge. perhaps attaching floats and tying them off to a cable attached to a strong piece of equipment on shore that can pull em on shore
shit show
That’s what I was thinking