However, there might be some value in destroying the original source otherwise they wouldn't have done it. Could make prosecuting Hunter a little bit harder. However, that may not be too much of a problem. Hunter has done so many shady things, something would definitely stick.
This could also just be a message to the public of how corrupt the FBI is. This specific snippet is difficult to deny. How do you justify destroying evidence?
So did the guy who owns the store.
However, there might be some value in destroying the original source otherwise they wouldn't have done it. Could make prosecuting Hunter a little bit harder. However, that may not be too much of a problem. Hunter has done so many shady things, something would definitely stick.
This could also just be a message to the public of how corrupt the FBI is. This specific snippet is difficult to deny. How do you justify destroying evidence?
"Nothing is ever truly erased/deleted." Laptop or no laptop, NSA and MI already have it ALL.