Please refresh my memory... who is this Thomas Wictor, and why should we listen to him? The name sounds vaguely familiar, but I cannot recall for the life of me what his bond fides are.
He's a military historian and analyst, and touts himself as "the world's only living expert in WW1 era flamethrowers". So he's got a good sense of humor too lol. But back in early 2016 he took note of Trump's tactics and predicted that Trump would with with 300+ EVs. He has pushed the idea ever since that Trump's presidency is a military operation, even before Q came around. Also notable is that he is not a Q guy himself, but he has come to alot of the same conclusions just by observing and analyzing Trump's actions and the events surrounding them.
I read points of view by various pundits/commentators for possible insight that I might not otherwise have, but then draw my own conclusions. Some of Wictor's stuff is valuable, but IMO his perspective isn't always valid. The same can be said of a lot of stuff I read.
Please refresh my memory... who is this Thomas Wictor, and why should we listen to him? The name sounds vaguely familiar, but I cannot recall for the life of me what his bond fides are.
He's a military historian and analyst, and touts himself as "the world's only living expert in WW1 era flamethrowers". So he's got a good sense of humor too lol. But back in early 2016 he took note of Trump's tactics and predicted that Trump would with with 300+ EVs. He has pushed the idea ever since that Trump's presidency is a military operation, even before Q came around. Also notable is that he is not a Q guy himself, but he has come to alot of the same conclusions just by observing and analyzing Trump's actions and the events surrounding them.
Use discernment. Listen to everything...come to your own opinions..ultimately..you trust yourself.
This ^ is the correct answer. Thanks fren!
I read points of view by various pundits/commentators for possible insight that I might not otherwise have, but then draw my own conclusions. Some of Wictor's stuff is valuable, but IMO his perspective isn't always valid. The same can be said of a lot of stuff I read.