5
quai24 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Law enforcement should interview the THERAPISTs. Each shooter has one coincidentally. Targets? Relocation within 30 days of each shooting? New name? FBI doesn’t know this? Spooks are hard to find? Dream to reality. Q"

Q1629, June 18th, 2018

4
quai24 4 points ago +4 / -0

JFK and RFK Sr.'s gravesite is literally shaped like a Q when viewed from above.

1
quai24 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excellent point.

4
quai24 4 points ago +4 / -0

Probably at least as much as he knows about the circumstances of his uncle, father, and cousin's deaths.

4
quai24 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you have a link to the original quote OP? I don't doubt that Bobby said this, but I want to have sauce.

7
quai24 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly. You can prove fraud in DJT or Kari Lake's elections tomorrow, most Dems will not care, and others will say it is justified because orange man bad. The only way you are going to redpill the other half of the country on election fraud is to have it happen to "their guy"

21
quai24 21 points ago +21 / -0

DJT as POTUS, RFK Jr as VP. The DNC will screw RFK worse than they screwed Bernie, Trump will then take him as his running mate.

What would be insane is if, after announcing RFK as his VP, Trump renounces the Republican label altogether, and declares Trump/Kennedy to be the "America First" ticket. If you wanted to nuke the two party illusion forever, that would be a way to do it. From there, you could also refuse to refer to your opponents as the "Democrat" ticket, and instead refer to them only as the "Uniparty", "Swamp", "Globalists", etc.

22
quai24 22 points ago +22 / -0

These people need to be marked for the rest of their lives, like ex-nazis in post war Germany. It doesn't matter how much they reform themselves after this is all over, like a recovering alcoholic, they can never be allowed to forget what they were.

14
quai24 14 points ago +14 / -0

Remember when Q posted "Summer of Love redux?" after Roe got struck down? Remember how the rioting was minimal compared to 2020 and fizzled out after about 2 weeks?

I think that drop was Q trolling the enemy.

3
quai24 3 points ago +3 / -0

They let FDR walk over them, yes. They should have shot back, but the hard fact is that they did not. And even if they did, the government would have come back with bigger guns. Bitcoin cannot be confiscated because it is just code. Its intangibility is a feature, not a bug.

And what happens when the government or banks simply decide that the paper can no longer be redeemed for gold? As was the case when Nixon ended the gold standard by EO? And as was the case with every fiat scam that has been run in history. You can add all the laws and safeguards and oversight you want, the fact is that governments and banks will always find a way to print over the gold, and people will always fall for it.

Governments and banks have proven over and over, over the course of millennia, that they cannot be trusted to administer a system of money in a competent manner, let alone an honest and impartial one. The whole of history, but especially the nightmare of the past century, proves that they need to be removed from the equation of money entirely. Bitcoin accomplishes this.

2
quai24 2 points ago +2 / -0

The USPS is still headed by a Trump appointee, just FYI.

0
quai24 0 points ago +2 / -2

Imagine going on a Q board and linking, not just to a list of shitcoins, but a list of shitcoins endorsed by the World Economic Forum.

1
quai24 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you think that Bitcoin's only utility is as a form of payment, I would advise you to look into the work of Space Force Major Jason Lowery.

1
quai24 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it has a CEO or a foundation, it is a shitcoin, and it is going to zero. This includes the Federal Reserve Note.

2
quai24 2 points ago +2 / -0

"As if the same government can't crack down on crypto exchanges."

Self custody, bro.

2
quai24 2 points ago +3 / -1

So in other words, Gold 1.0 would have kept us out of this mess if the government and banks had just acted honorably and preserved the gold standard that was keeping them from getting filthy rich via printing fedbucks.

That is the problem with the gold standard. It requires you to trust governments and banks to act honestly. The fact that the gold standard is a trust-based system is the reason it has failed and given way to a fiat ponzi scheme every time it has been tried in human history.

Bitcoin eliminates the need for trust in the monetary system. And in the long run, it eliminates the need for governments to issue money, or banks to custody it.

Bitcoin is backed by mathematics and code. It is a set of laws that does not require government to enforce. And it is further backed by the astronomical amount of energy consumed to keep it that way, currently twice the annual power consumption of the US Navy and climbing.

0
quai24 0 points ago +6 / -6

Bitcoin makes gold obsolete. Bitcoin does not need to be backed by gold because Bitcoin is harder money than gold.

-1
quai24 -1 points ago +3 / -4

Gold 2.0 (also known as Bitcoin) will kill the Fed. Gold 1.0 got us into this mess in the first place.

3
quai24 3 points ago +4 / -1

ETH lost all relevance when it switched to Proof of Stake.

3
quai24 3 points ago +5 / -2

Gold and silver cannot compete with the CBDC. Bitcoin can.

Ironically, Bitcoin is the only asset that will be left standing when all the other shitcoins croak.

1
quai24 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, but the fact that it is virtual is not an issue in my opinion. Everything else in the world has been digitized, and the digitization of money is inevitable too. The issue is centralization vs decentralization.

Unlike the central bank system, Bitcoin is decentralized, with no single point of control or failure, and an absolutely limited supply. And it is virtually impossible to change these rules due to the hashpower behind the network (twice the yearly energy consumption of the US Navy and rising). This makes it the system best suited to compete with the CBDC.

Gold and silver are good for protecting existing wealth imo (as long as you make sure to lose them in a tragic boating accident), but they cannot provide an effective alternative to the CBDC as a unit of exchange, whereas Bitcoin can.

view more: Next ›