I understand your point,but disagree. More - I even consider your words as being big undeserved insult about Japanese people.
I consider it insult for Japanese people,because it is obvious for me,that loyalty and honour was and is big part of Japanese culture. Comparing it to semites however - there is reason why arab or jew are stereotypical traders.It is good question how many of them are really good and where lies their loyalty. How many times would Japanese ever swear and break the oath (especially then) ?
Maybe there are good people among them,but I guess semites shall not be trusted.
If Japanese-American citizens shall maybe be isolated during WWII - lawful option would be maybe relocation to closed districts like "ghettos",but NOT government "camps" - that thing was clear abuse of power. Who would pay for that ? Well,those people left their homes right ? So leasing it to let them lease place somewhere else would be fair and the rest shall be paid by government. But Rosevelt was demoncrap (it is possible his roots were Dutch Jews in fact) not far away from being communist or fascist himself - and that's why it were concentration camps for Japanese people.
Second of all - well racism indeed exist(ed) and Americans not understanded Japanese culture.Basics about it: Japanese people are generally people of honour It was also racism because of obvious reason: why German-Americans were not treated same way ? Or Italian-Americans ?
lawful option would be maybe relocation to closed districts like "ghettos",but NOT government "camps" - that thing was clear abuse of power.
That's what the Nazis did to the jews, before rounding them into concentration camps.
Second of all - well racism indeed exist(ed) and Americans not understanded Japanese culture.Basics about it: Japanese people are generally people of honourable It was also racism because of obvious reason: why German-Americans were not treated same way ? Or Italian-Americans ?
So people of Japanese decent got singled out by wider society, and put into camps. Sounds like what the Nazis did to the jews, singling a group out of society and rounding them up because racism.
It is good question how many of them are really good and where lies their loyalty.
Thereby demonstrating you don't understand my point. This exact line of thought was the driving force behind the internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2, where the prevailing belief was that a majority would side with Japan and conduct espionage on the US mainland.
That's what the Nazis did to the jews, before rounding them into concentration camps.
Except the fact its purpose I mentioned that solution was avoiding concentration camps.
This exact line of thought was the driving force behind the internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2, where the prevailing belief was that a majority would side with Japan and conduct espionage on the US mainland.
So what you really suggest they had to do ? War is war,war sucks, in war better to harm few that all. You tell it is evil ? Agree.Agree.Agree.
In fact Japanese are generally people which could be trusted. Today we know it.
But trusting every arab or jew is extremely stupid and is today dangerous idea. Maybe is exaggerated - maybe not. The difference is USA government doesn't asked Japanese for proving their loyalty to USA. If good jewish people and good arab people would help get rid of the bad ones - it will be really most beneficial to them.
Do we declared them our enemies ? In fact: NO.** Unfortunately jihadists would murder us without mercy. And Jewish communist satanists spreading hate about white and asian people and wanting to enslave all people are not better than them**. What is worst about those groups - they not fight openly.Not wear uniforms. They use larger groups of people which or support them or not understand in what danger they put them. But trusting all people from those groups makes us vulnerable.
Vulnerable to be killed with our families or enslaved at "best" (i think it is already worse one) case.
I would really want,I would love to see all people good,to trust everybody,to not want harm of anybody. If everybody would do that world would be much better.But we live in unperfect world. And price of good people trusting bad people is good people being harmed or even dead...
I understand your point,but disagree. More - I even consider your words as being big undeserved insult about Japanese people.
I consider it insult for Japanese people,because it is obvious for me,that loyalty and honour was and is big part of Japanese culture. Comparing it to semites however - there is reason why arab or jew are stereotypical traders.It is good question how many of them are really good and where lies their loyalty. How many times would Japanese ever swear and break the oath (especially then) ?
Maybe there are good people among them,but I guess semites shall not be trusted.
If Japanese-American citizens shall maybe be isolated during WWII - lawful option would be maybe relocation to closed districts like "ghettos",but NOT government "camps" - that thing was clear abuse of power. Who would pay for that ? Well,those people left their homes right ? So leasing it to let them lease place somewhere else would be fair and the rest shall be paid by government. But Rosevelt was demoncrap (it is possible his roots were Dutch Jews in fact) not far away from being communist or fascist himself - and that's why it were concentration camps for Japanese people.
Second of all - well racism indeed exist(ed) and Americans not understanded Japanese culture.Basics about it: Japanese people are generally people of honour It was also racism because of obvious reason: why German-Americans were not treated same way ? Or Italian-Americans ?
That's what the Nazis did to the jews, before rounding them into concentration camps.
So people of Japanese decent got singled out by wider society, and put into camps. Sounds like what the Nazis did to the jews, singling a group out of society and rounding them up because racism.
Thereby demonstrating you don't understand my point. This exact line of thought was the driving force behind the internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2, where the prevailing belief was that a majority would side with Japan and conduct espionage on the US mainland.
Glowfag somewhere else
Except the fact its purpose I mentioned that solution was avoiding concentration camps.
So what you really suggest they had to do ? War is war,war sucks, in war better to harm few that all. You tell it is evil ? Agree.Agree.Agree.
In fact Japanese are generally people which could be trusted. Today we know it. But trusting every arab or jew is extremely stupid and is today dangerous idea. Maybe is exaggerated - maybe not. The difference is USA government doesn't asked Japanese for proving their loyalty to USA. If good jewish people and good arab people would help get rid of the bad ones - it will be really most beneficial to them.
Do we declared them our enemies ? In fact: NO.** Unfortunately jihadists would murder us without mercy. And Jewish communist satanists spreading hate about white and asian people and wanting to enslave all people are not better than them**. What is worst about those groups - they not fight openly.Not wear uniforms. They use larger groups of people which or support them or not understand in what danger they put them. But trusting all people from those groups makes us vulnerable. Vulnerable to be killed with our families or enslaved at "best" (i think it is already worse one) case.
I would really want,I would love to see all people good,to trust everybody,to not want harm of anybody. If everybody would do that world would be much better.But we live in unperfect world. And price of good people trusting bad people is good people being harmed or even dead...