I've been watching the HBO documentary about Q and there are some things I was curious about as I had not heard this info before. I was not aware that there are some people under the impression that the current Q we follow may not be the original Q. What are your guys thoughts on this and why? Is there any proof that this Q is the same as the original Q and if so, what? Are we just taking Codemonkey's word for it (though that doesn't sound like something the anons I've come to know would do)?
Another question I had is what are your opinions on Fred/Jim/Ron? I do not like how Fred seemed to flip flop on his opinions about 8kun once he quit/was fired. And Jim seems like a shady character. They all do, honestly. The way the Doc is filmed or perhaps it's the way they all are acting, it's almost as if this whole Q thing is a game to them. Something that drives publicity to their site, and nothing more. I'm actually really surprised that this is who runs the board the almighty Q posts on. Any thoughts/opinions/sauce is greatly appreciated.
HBO thinks Q has been identified - they’re wrong. We follow a Q who has not communicated in months.
This is similar to the Bible and Church issue we see (although the Bible we have was translated who knows how many times by people with who knows what knowledge or intentions - at least it seems we have the unaltered Q posts): one canon - many interpretations that result.
In general I think we need to focus on Q posts and doing our own research. I think that was Q’s whole purpose - give us a sneak peek behind the curtain to motivate us to think critically and research. No datefagging, no posts for social credit (upvotes), just focus on finding truth.