It could be true, it could not be true. If you look at the media, they have been sculpting American's to rush to judgment for many years. Let's go all the way back to the Duke Lacrosse team. They supposedly raped that black girl? They were smeared and hated across the country? They were the personification of the white devils? And guess what---- INNOCENT.
How about Jon Benet Ramsey's parents, who I believe Lin Wood represented? They were guilty, right? Guilty guilty guilty? Definitely guilty? Oh wait, DNA evidence cleared them years later.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is not just some bullshit we can take for granted. It is a PRINCIPLE, and a very important one. We must remember this lesson for if/when our enemies are arrested. If Hillary Clinton was arrested, we need to do our damndest to know that she is innocent until proven guilty. Or else we are just savages.
There are so many possibilities, I dont know where to start. How about perhaps his person is someone you care about, and happens to be at risk, perhaps an orphan and if you don't adopt the chances are his life is going to take a dark dive ?
The real question is, if you fight against sex trafficking, is there anything in your life they wont try to smear to turn it against you?
I am not saying whether he is guilty or innocent. But everything I am hearing so far sounds like typical leftist smear job. We should keep our minds open until we know better.
The right is quick to believe any salacious story if someone from the left is accused, but when the inverse occurs -- excuses are made. The opposite is true for leftists, too. That is the problem with holding a politically motivated ideology.
If there are accusations definitely we have to take it seriously. I might be wrong, but so far its all inferences beyond any accusations that have been rebutted by him.
But be careful. if you go down your perfection route you have to believe Trump colluded with Russia and Flynn was guilty etc. This is the play book of the left and we have to prioritise being careful to being "fair"
I havent really seen him talk much. Never paid too much attention. I believe in instincts. If you watch him often and your instinct says there is something fishy, that means something. But whatever we believe it, it should be on our terms. I just worry a lot of people fall for sophisticated media smear jobs. In this particular case, we have to wait and see - its an interesting case.
The only problem with this theory is that the DOJ had opened up the sex trafficking investigation under Bill Barr's DOJ. But you can ask why the beans got spilled now?
That's legit.
It could be true, it could not be true. If you look at the media, they have been sculpting American's to rush to judgment for many years. Let's go all the way back to the Duke Lacrosse team. They supposedly raped that black girl? They were smeared and hated across the country? They were the personification of the white devils? And guess what---- INNOCENT.
How about Jon Benet Ramsey's parents, who I believe Lin Wood represented? They were guilty, right? Guilty guilty guilty? Definitely guilty? Oh wait, DNA evidence cleared them years later.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is not just some bullshit we can take for granted. It is a PRINCIPLE, and a very important one. We must remember this lesson for if/when our enemies are arrested. If Hillary Clinton was arrested, we need to do our damndest to know that she is innocent until proven guilty. Or else we are just savages.
What sane man adopts a 17-year-old boy?
There are so many possibilities, I dont know where to start. How about perhaps his person is someone you care about, and happens to be at risk, perhaps an orphan and if you don't adopt the chances are his life is going to take a dark dive ?
The real question is, if you fight against sex trafficking, is there anything in your life they wont try to smear to turn it against you?
I am not saying whether he is guilty or innocent. But everything I am hearing so far sounds like typical leftist smear job. We should keep our minds open until we know better.
The right is quick to believe any salacious story if someone from the left is accused, but when the inverse occurs -- excuses are made. The opposite is true for leftists, too. That is the problem with holding a politically motivated ideology.
If there are accusations definitely we have to take it seriously. I might be wrong, but so far its all inferences beyond any accusations that have been rebutted by him.
But be careful. if you go down your perfection route you have to believe Trump colluded with Russia and Flynn was guilty etc. This is the play book of the left and we have to prioritise being careful to being "fair"
I havent really seen him talk much. Never paid too much attention. I believe in instincts. If you watch him often and your instinct says there is something fishy, that means something. But whatever we believe it, it should be on our terms. I just worry a lot of people fall for sophisticated media smear jobs. In this particular case, we have to wait and see - its an interesting case.
A single man in his early thirties adopting a twelve-year-old boy from a foreign country sounds suspicious as all get out.
From what I remember him saying the boy was his long time girlfriends son
The only problem with this theory is that the DOJ had opened up the sex trafficking investigation under Bill Barr's DOJ. But you can ask why the beans got spilled now? That's legit.
I made that Trump in Florida connection to my homie today who I was trying to catch up on stuff today hahaha
he doesn't pay too much attention to the news