The article does not name the ship [Ever Given] specifically. It refers to the ship as the "Evergreen's ship" which is correct. The ship is owned by Evergreen, and the context of the article makes that clear when talking about the ship.
Secondly, the Marshall Report, and Before it's News, are both fairly reliable alt news sites from what I have seen in the past, and both have broken large news stories before. But I agree that we are going to need to see some extraordinary proofs to back up these extraordinary claims, and "some guy heard from some other guys" isn't going to cut it.
BIN and MR are like 90% crap. I'd avoid. Even if they have something decent once in a while there's too much garbage to use them for anything reliably.
The article does not name the ship [Ever Given] specifically. It refers to the ship as the "Evergreen's ship" which is correct. The ship is owned by Evergreen, and the context of the article makes that clear when talking about the ship.
Secondly, the Marshall Report, and Before it's News, are both fairly reliable alt news sites from what I have seen in the past, and both have broken large news stories before. But I agree that we are going to need to see some extraordinary proofs to back up these extraordinary claims, and "some guy heard from some other guys" isn't going to cut it.
BIN and MR are like 90% crap. I'd avoid. Even if they have something decent once in a while there's too much garbage to use them for anything reliably.
I did examine the source, and I said that a "someone said they heard something from someone else..." isn't going to cut it as a reliable source.