I have been noticing Sidney Powell getting more and more confident and dropping huge specifics and I think they have great evidence. Her team has been continuing to grow and now we actually have a serious team. Sidney is one of the best lawyers to have in this situation her team has grown huge whether Flynn, Rudy,Patrick Byrne, Dr. Frank, The former military specialist, the $star general from Venezuela, ETC.
When I see dates many don't necessarily make sense except this explanation. That is the time that the satellite and starling satellite comes online and offers certain wifi and even TV. People would use this free service and big tech, media complex, can't do anything about it. Any reasonable person who would look at this evidence would clearly see it was stolen. Hunters laptop, etc. People would see how rotten the media is and what big tech was doing to censor the people fighting for this. People would stop watching the news as much. People would cancel there xfinity/comcast because they have free access now and companies like that own NBC etc. You kill the enemy economically and by exposing them. A new telecommunication infrastructure and law.
People would just be pissed and could agree though, imagine having to watch the 4,5 state senate committee hearings on voter fraud, some confessions from big guys exposing their crimes for reduced time. Americans hold and host a new election system and we have a serious conversation about rebuilding and thinking our election and it helps inspire other parts of the world:
Watch Sidney Powell and there seems to be a lot of evidence and seriousness of a problem and imagine what she has coming, Byrne said the same thing, Lindell has expressed the same as well as and that 8chun post. Also included a little Dr. Navaro because he also is a savage.
PART 1: https://rumble.com/vfbwwh-part-1-sidney-powell-is-not-backing-down.html
PART 2: https://rumble.com/vfbwzt-part-2-sidney-powell-gives-her-side-of-the-story.html
PART 4: https://rumble.com/vfbxqh-part-4-sidney-powell-discusses-whats-actually-happening-in-america.html
Navaro Hunters Laptop: https://rumble.com/vfbbrt-navarro-destroys-hunter-biden-white-privilege-democrat-royalty.html
Technocracy: Tracing the Roots of ‘The Great Reset’ : https://rumble.com/vfbybl-technocracy-tracing-the-roots-of-the-great-reset.html
This would be crazy I think if its powerful enough evidence Biden loses the military 100% and we clear out some swamp water
Starlink requires a satellite dish. Probably well over half the people in the US do not have the capacity to have a satellite dish (do not own their own home/live in apartments/big city). Even if you do live in a house, Starlink won't be free, and neither will the satellite dish.
Don't get me wrong, I think it will likely be a disruptive technology, but its not going to reach that level soon.
You don't think these 5th generation satellites from space force could possibly have the ability to give or take somebodies internet? Trump learned a lot getting fucked over and tapping his phone before impeachment. He realized we actually were find so behind in the satellite/droning/autonomous engagement and thats where they were getting us totally a symmetrical and could beat us this way with bioweapons, confusing media, coop and race riots started...
Starlink is not space force, though I would not be surprised if Space Force was involved in their development and/or deployment.
Regardless, you can't just make a signal magically go somewhere. There has to be a receiver somewhere. Can someone take over your internet (highjack the network you are on)? Of course. You don't need satellites to do that. I don't see how that translates into getting onto an independent network like Starlink without the hardware to receive the signal.
They totally worked together. You don't think its possible the United States military doesn't have control of those satellites when we are in a war situation? Especially if they do anything to compromise us.
I really don't understand what you are trying to say. Can the military take over Starlink? Without a doubt. Can the military take over the current networks our computers are on? Without a doubt. What does one have to do with the other?
Starlink is a separate network. Of course it ties into the land based networks (fiber) we are all on, but in order to receive the signals from the Starlink satellites (or any other satellite) there must be a receiver. In order to get the signal to us, the military has to take over the specific network we are on. That is, for most of us, the fiber network. Taking over Starlink is not relevant to that necessary task.