179 It would be unconstitutional for Kamala to hold office as president. (media.greatawakening.win) posted 3 years ago by Atomstein 3 years ago by Atomstein +183 / -4 47 comments download share 47 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're wrong, utterly wrong, and there's gonna be no bending it till you're right.
She wasn't subject to US jurisdiction. She was subject to the jurisdiction of her parents, who were subject to the jurisdiction of the country they came from.