It simply doesn't say what everyone here thinks it says. In fact, it's particular to specific location and authorities of the old County of Washington and the cities therein now called District of Columbia. It is a sort of constitution for the District of Columbia with many specifications.
Nowhere does it apply outside the District of Columbia. I don't see how it can be construed to have authority outside the District of Columbia.
Read it -- it's refreshingly plainly written with no legal mumbo jumbo at all.
You are almost there fren, it made DC a "city state" owned by the Crown because of the Civil War bankruptcy covered by the Crown and the Vatican, these United States are collateral for that debt. Look for another high point in 1870 and 1868 where it made the Act of 1871 possible. Realize this, this is the "gotcha" the Cabal trapped us with..
Okay . . . I guess . . . but look at the Public Law itself. I provided a link and repeat it here: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
It simply doesn't say what everyone here thinks it says. In fact, it's particular to specific location and authorities of the old County of Washington and the cities therein now called District of Columbia. It is a sort of constitution for the District of Columbia with many specifications.
Nowhere does it apply outside the District of Columbia. I don't see how it can be construed to have authority outside the District of Columbia.
Read it -- it's refreshingly plainly written with no legal mumbo jumbo at all.
You are almost there fren, it made DC a "city state" owned by the Crown because of the Civil War bankruptcy covered by the Crown and the Vatican, these United States are collateral for that debt. Look for another high point in 1870 and 1868 where it made the Act of 1871 possible. Realize this, this is the "gotcha" the Cabal trapped us with..