He's showing an extremely strong and compelling correlation between the Q posts and the DOD Law of War manual. He took the lead of another Anon who make the connection in January.
Just watched it, and think he's correct. Whether it means anything IRL, that's another story.
Au Contraire Mon Frere. The State in this example would be a 'Country's territory", as in Puerto Rico being a territory of the US. So, according to the manual or Law of War, the US military could not use the rule of belligerent occupation against the leaders of Puerto Rico. However in the case of DC, as soon as Biden was certified as POTUS, DC instantly became occupied territory by a foreign government. Specifically the CCP. In order to avoid full scale war with China everything had to be done just as we are seeing! Be patient and know that WE are doing everything "By the Book".
Isn't it just his interpretation of his proof. I think I'll wait until Trump tells me himself. I'm done with what ifs.
He's showing an extremely strong and compelling correlation between the Q posts and the DOD Law of War manual. He took the lead of another Anon who make the connection in January.
Just watched it, and think he's correct. Whether it means anything IRL, that's another story.
Au Contraire Mon Frere. The State in this example would be a 'Country's territory", as in Puerto Rico being a territory of the US. So, according to the manual or Law of War, the US military could not use the rule of belligerent occupation against the leaders of Puerto Rico. However in the case of DC, as soon as Biden was certified as POTUS, DC instantly became occupied territory by a foreign government. Specifically the CCP. In order to avoid full scale war with China everything had to be done just as we are seeing! Be patient and know that WE are doing everything "By the Book".
I agree! And wouldn't DC also be occupied territory by a foreign government per the US Corporation of 1871?