That is most likely, it'd make sense, because as it stands, this kind of picture, legally speaking, is not proof of anything. There's no timeframe for this, there's no context or reference, there's no nothing.
We know they cheated, but this as it stands, as a singular, poor resolution picture, doesn't prove anything.
I know it's not what people HERE want to hear, but if you're going to go out claiming something, realistically you need something more solid. I just personally don't like it when people make claims on something so flimsy. It makes the whole argument look really silly.
That is most likely, it'd make sense, because as it stands, this kind of picture, legally speaking, is not proof of anything. There's no timeframe for this, there's no context or reference, there's no nothing.
We know they cheated, but this as it stands, as a singular, poor resolution picture, doesn't prove anything.
I know it's not what people HERE want to hear, but if you're going to go out claiming something, realistically you need something more solid. I just personally don't like it when people make claims on something so flimsy. It makes the whole argument look really silly.
I came here for this comment specifically. Thank you!