Great work. The problem I'm having doing battle with those aligned with Covid vax is they reject out of hand any news article, video, website, etc. The only evidence they will consider is official peer reviewed studies. According to them, they all show sunshine and roses. We need to find studies that were buried, hidden or not published for some stupid reason. The Lancet article was rejected but the public found out. They argue it was rejected because that's how science works and that shows the peer review studies are passing with flying colors and working as intended.

I'm not a vaccine kook but this Covid thing really needs some hard looking into. We need insider whistle blowers with evidence of numbers being cooked, data being altered, negative results being ignored, things like that. The links are helpful in a PR battle but they do little to no good with the big influence wielding people arguing for it's use. They are locked in tight to their positions. The only things that could sway them would be proof of a coverup, criminal malfeasance in the form of emails between actors changing tests, outcomes, getting bought off, etc.

That PCR test is a weak link and something they have used repeatedly to confirm the presence of Covid-19 and for diagnosing people. That is something that needs a big dig. If we can find evidence of the type that lawsuits are built around showing that the high cycle PCR false positives where included in the total case numbers in a significant way, that would be a boom. Or if the testing apparatus was designed to give false positives if certain things were done (think voting machines) that would be a big help. I'm doing battle daily with memes, news reports, etc. and it just gets waived away as contrived and worthless. I'm going to keep looking and if anyone reading this finds this type of material, let me know.