Yes, I'm it would be more. And cash in front. The ME works for the county and moonlights doing private autopsies. I was referred to this ME by solid sources. The ME didn't go that deep with the micro level but did answer some major questions. I feel it was worth it and would do it again if I thought a vaccine killed my loved one.
So it depends what the questions are beforehand. In a 'regular' autopsy, you might just be looking for heart attack and vascular issues, or spread of cancer that caused the death. That investigation is simpler than looking for autoantibodies etc and doing special stains on multiple tissues, sometimes using special microscopes and techniques.
All those extras are expensive, and like everything else, getting them isn't promoted. But if we knew just a few critical questions to ask it wouldn't be necessary to do everything. That's the problem, what are we looking for that is definitive? Or will it have to be a more probabilistic determination based on a cluster of findings?
You're right. Say it's myocarditis, you thoroughly do the heart, and a couple other areas. There's a pathologist in CT, Dr Sin Hang Lee, who investigated an HPV-vac (Gardasil) related death, who should have his 'protocol' for vac-related deaths. I just DDG'd for his name, and found this article, which goes though mechanisms DNA/Aluminum and macrophages etc. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120808006480/en/SaneVax-Announces-Medical-Surprise-Gardasil%C2%AE-HPV-DNA
Yes, I'm it would be more. And cash in front. The ME works for the county and moonlights doing private autopsies. I was referred to this ME by solid sources. The ME didn't go that deep with the micro level but did answer some major questions. I feel it was worth it and would do it again if I thought a vaccine killed my loved one.
So it depends what the questions are beforehand. In a 'regular' autopsy, you might just be looking for heart attack and vascular issues, or spread of cancer that caused the death. That investigation is simpler than looking for autoantibodies etc and doing special stains on multiple tissues, sometimes using special microscopes and techniques.
All those extras are expensive, and like everything else, getting them isn't promoted. But if we knew just a few critical questions to ask it wouldn't be necessary to do everything. That's the problem, what are we looking for that is definitive? Or will it have to be a more probabilistic determination based on a cluster of findings?
You're right. Say it's myocarditis, you thoroughly do the heart, and a couple other areas. There's a pathologist in CT, Dr Sin Hang Lee, who investigated an HPV-vac (Gardasil) related death, who should have his 'protocol' for vac-related deaths. I just DDG'd for his name, and found this article, which goes though mechanisms DNA/Aluminum and macrophages etc. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120808006480/en/SaneVax-Announces-Medical-Surprise-Gardasil%C2%AE-HPV-DNA
There really have been a ton of studies this year on COVID-19, but not vaccine reactions. I don't think we know any good markers yet.