It's kinda funny now, that Dem politicians trying to pack the SC is being seen by fellow Dems as a dangerous thing, that it would "hurt the confidence in the courts".... I can only speak for myself, I guess, by I have 0 confidence in the court already. They wouldn't hear a case about election fraud before the election because it hadn't happened yet... and then after the election they wouldn't hear it because it already happened and there is nothing they could do. They wouldn't let Texas sue the other states, even though that is what the damn court is for - to decide on issues between the states, and if other states stealing the national election isn't worthy of at least HEARING, I don't know what is. I guess the SC would become like the 9th circuit on steroids if they were to keep adding lefty/progressive judges every time the wind blows, but whatever, that court has already shown it serves no purpose but to protect the DS.
It's kinda funny now, that Dem politicians trying to pack the SC is being seen by fellow Dems as a dangerous thing, that it would "hurt the confidence in the courts".... I can only speak for myself, I guess, by I have 0 confidence in the court already. They wouldn't hear a case about election fraud before the election because it hadn't happened yet... and then after the election they wouldn't hear it because it already happened and there is nothing they could do. They wouldn't let Texas sue the other states, even though that is what the damn court is for - to decide on issues between the states, and if other states stealing the national election isn't worthy of at least HEARING, I don't know what is. I guess the SC would become like the 9th circuit on steroids if they were to keep adding lefty/progressive judges every time the wind blows, but whatever, that court has already shown it serves no purpose but to protect the DS.