In these two threads yesterday, I ventured my assessment that the adrenochrome conspiracy-as-is-commonly-promoted on alt-sites such as this one is probably a blind alley we're being led into while the real ongoing Cabal "fountain of youth" -- fetal (and "partial-birth") stem-cell harvesting via the abortion industry -- is stiff-armed into the shadows.
Both of these sub-threads were deleted despite no visible negative feedback (i.e., no downvotes, 16 total upvotes), and at least one of the posts is about the subject and still is up (so I assume it's not a matter of being off-topic).
Appreciate mods looking into it. Thanks.
I have 10K / 2.4K karma what are you on about?
Bandwagon fallacy. Any nominally-organized group of posters can ring-vote themselves into rock-stars. Your segue off-topic into shoot-the-messenger ad hominem is classic troll.
It's easy to create an "exciting" fiction (adrenochrome from children) that closely resembles a going-on-for-decades "boring" reality (the fetal tissue-harvesting industry), and steer everyone away from one into the other. They exhaust themselves researching the dead ends of the exiting fiction, and lose credibility when they can't prove any of it. Frazzledrip, for instance, has patriots everywhere diving into unsavory places in an attempt to confirm it; should they ever be arrested for anything, what do you supposed the prosecution will do with their browser's search-history? They'll be accused of "looking for child porn", that's what.
"The best way to control any individual in the Information Age is via temptation into self-discreditation."
Exercise OPSEC.
Again youd have a much funner experience If you would formulate your posts in a way people can engage with them Im not here to argue though so have fun rambling like your paranoid.
Also the stamcells can be havested from donated cords and are apart from a very tiny percentage that is indeed sold by bad bad people like planned paranthood. after a delivery of a baby and adrenochrome is tortured out of children. which one seems more acute in its emergency to you ?
"which one seems more acute in its emergency to you"
If, a) children being tortured for adrenochrome actually actually in the scale as you imagine is does, and b) patriots were in control, then the ethical imperivate would be to immediately declare on them and blow the shit out of them, and screw the "normies" clutching their pearls about "fascism" as the military rampaged cleaning it all up. Routine blood-harvesting of children would be the perfect thing for those who "have it all" to hijack the airwaves and "show the people", don't you think? Shock-and-awe, Schwarzkopf-style. But they didn't done that. Your theory doesn't fit what we observe.
Your theory proposes that Donald & NSA or Q & Flynn & good military men everywhere, instead of instantly swinging into action, sat on their hands for four years waiting to "awaken" the normies -- which is the antithesis of an "emergency" response. If there's an emergency, you'd don't play slow-motion chess.