I’ve considered on several occasions that the phrasing Q uses is misdirection. It’s not “flat”, true.
But Q doesn’t explicitly confirm NASA’s model either.
Considering Hegelian synthesis, this suggests something along the lines of a convex model or similar.
In any case, YouTube’s insistence on sticking a flat earth Wikipedia brief on every flat earth vid is a big red flag. I’m open to the possibility. Think mirror.
I’ve considered on several occasions that the phrasing Q uses is misdirection. It’s not “flat”, true.
But Q doesn’t explicitly confirm NASA’s model either.
Considering Hegelian synthesis, this suggests something along the lines of a convex model or similar.
In any case, YouTube’s insistence on sticking a flat earth Wikipedia brief on every flat earth vid is a big red flag. I’m open to the possibility. Think mirror.