Big ML fan. Love what he is doing for the patriot movement. But here's what I run into when I share this video with people I'm trying to educate about the fraud: They say "There's no proof. You're just taking his word for it."
I realize that there is all sorts of proof out there, so no need to dump it all here. The real issue is that if ML's videos are at the tip of the spear, then we need to be able to make the normies believe the credibility of the expert guests. We know that the normies and the opposition will dismiss the videos due to cognitive dissonance or simple oppositional defiance,
What can we encourage ML to do to make his evidence transcend himself and his guests... something that would be along the lines of Doubting Thomas having a chance to put his own fingers in the holes in Christ's hands? I fear that the most incredible thing is occurring in our culture: the plethora of information (accurate and disinfo) is leading to confusion and distrust of ALL information unless it comes from a source that is aligned with what you already believe. Do we truly realize the ramifications of this pattern?
Anyway, how can we help ML? What would help his evidence be irrefutable even to the opposition? Thanks for thinking about it.
This is fairly simplistic...I am in tech and mostly networking/system integration on a national scale. What was shown in the latest video is pretty damning. I mean the origination (collection point) of the data, basic chain of custody stuff, and knowing how they decode the packets to identify "flipped votes" would be very interesting to someone like me that deals in packet level interactions with software, but to the average person it would be a foreign language all together.
It seems to me they have straight up, undeniable proof of vote flipping via the communication over the networks in a huge number of locations. a simple hand count of votes would identify this 100% unless as votes are switched the communication results in a physical ballot being trucked in the back door all while legitimate ballots are being pulled out. The level of complication with this while managing to keep the actual game secret would be tough to comprehend. Ya, i could make something like this work with the correct planning and group of people....but creating the physical ballots to clean up post the digital interference would take some man power...once that many people get involved, keeping it a secret is just impossible.
Its nice for people to think....people can't understand what the machines are doing...its too hard...but really that isn't true. If you have the packets as transmitted over the network, showing what is in them and the basics of how the software interacts with that particular packet, you have proof...that stands up in court.
Mike had a professional network expert that was clearly not old enough to be out of the work force. If this man got this wrong he will be forever remembered as being unable to perform the most basic of network level investigations. If he has the original, unmolested packets, and he came to the conclusion he did, i expect he is dead on....heck, If you give me the packets, i could have gotten much of the data he did with zero effort. The only part i would need to dig into is the part that identified they were actually flipping votes. That part takes a more detailed view of the contents of the packets...whats in the packet before...what is in the packet after.
Thanks for weighing in as an expert. Very helpful in increasing the validation level for us, and I can use some of your explanation with the people I am arguing with. Your description made me think of some of the high-tech animation of the mRNA vaccine and how it works, and I was just thinking that something like that could be effective at helping the simplest-minded people understand what this evidence really is, how it is easy to assess, how it is truthful, etc. Come on, ML... make something like that!