Sadly, you are right

Sad thing is that there are 50+ million people who are clueless and simply hate Trump (TDS) and therefore applaud all the lawfare because they think it's the good guys fighting back against Trump. The brainwashing is very thorough. We need the crimes against children to be exposed asap so as to wake more people up.

LOL

This is the red herring to detract from UNC and fort Detrick (however it's spelled)

Thanks for the list. Very helpful!

So, can we ever get out of this debt?

Thanks for your comment, now put your head down.

I personally think that this article on ZeroHedge was written by WH's and published as a foundational piece to begin the next phase of awakening.

This article is a very long essay with extremely detailed illustrations, models, charts, etc. It is supposedly a guy who decided to do a bunch of research on his own and then assemble everything at an extremely high professional level, and then dump it on a news aggregator site for free.

Thank you!

It's not about forgery, it's about authenticity. Youcould say that the autopen was the office of the President, whereas an imposter would be null and void if found out.

Very good to know! Thanks!

Theory: It was an actor in a mask, so this is a good way to absolve that actor's participation.

Or... it comes out that the DS had an actor with a mask in there, thus the need for auto pen. Wouldn't THAT be an amazing red pill????

If you're not prepped, there is still time. It's going to happen. NCSWIC

Scary shit. Do you think wH's thwarted what they discuss? The video is 3 years old... do you think the DS is saving this bullet?

So the mRNA spike protein hoopla and hysteria was actually a red herring (sort of) to detract from the more sinister truth that there was DNA in every vax?

Wowzer. I wonder how many people will believe this. Cognitive dissonance is off the charts regarding the vax. Go figure.

I definitely agree with your second point. Regarding the Robin Hood... I guess what I'm saying is that a person like me (without a stock portfolio) is not going to feel like the wealth lost by those who lost it in the market is suddenly in my pocket, or in my pocket over time. Lower cost of eggs, or a lower interest rate, or a lower cost of a car is something available to the rich as well. It's a loss of wealth more than it is a wealth transfer in my opinion. And I'm not against that--if you gamble you might lose.

It could definitely still be comms, though. I'm not good at finding that in the Q posts, though.

And, that bullshit cuts both ways, too. From my ignorant perspective, it just looks and feels like the WH's didn't account for the various tactics the deep state would apply. But, maybe this is "look weak when you are strong".

Whisky and whiskey are both used in American brands. Maker's Mark is whisky, fo example. Jack Daniels is whiskey.

According to Google's AI, 8.8% of Americans have a net worth greater than $1M. That correlates loosely to the 8% owning most of the stock, I suppose, but it's not a direct correlation without further evidence.

My personal opinion is that if you have a net worth of $1M or more, you're "rich", meaning that you can do things--eat a nice dinner when you want, have a home that is well-maintained, drive a car that is not at risk of breaking down, pay tuition for children, etc. This might sound like the middle class, but there are many rich people who do not buy the expensive stuff, too.

To me, the middle class (which is disappearing) are those who have less than a million in net worth and who have more opportunities than most, but are not yet at the point where they have the leverage to protect their wealth. Just my opinion, and I really have no basis for that. Just a personal perspective I use to guide my own decisions.

So true! And how many of them really understand the thousands of variables that affect their portfolio's value? They're just told, "The market goes up and down, but steadily upward, so don't panic."

When it's all said and done, most people invested as such are at the mercy of timing... will their portfolio be worth more or less when it is time for them to need it?

Those are helpful qualifiers and hopefully this won't be a barrier for good people to engage in the legal system appropriately. I'll be interested to see how the MSM spins this, though. More bullshit trying to make Trump look like a dictator.

Well, this could cut both ways. This feels reactive, not like the Plan. Just my opinion.

That would be wonderful. Unfortunately, "gaming" the system can mean many things. There are illegal tactics, yes. But there are also legal strategies that are loopholes, or complex work arounds, etc. that the super rich are aware of and can take advantage of due to the leverage they have with their wealth.

I think you'll be okay, as you are aware. My comment about the 6% was that there was a high likelihood that they are people who are not privy to the wealth-protection strategies that the very wealthy make use of. It's like it's a big secret club... and, I know I'm not in it. I wish you the best.

Interesting. I am not sure I agree with the idea that money is being taken from the rich and givento the poor. The rich people will also benefit from the lower prices. And, the poor people are not suddenly owners of the assets "taken" from the rich.

Now, are rich people facing a potential 20 percent loss of value? Yes. But usually the rich know how to navigate this volatility so as to protect their wealth. My bet is that the non-rich who own 6 percent of stocks will have their asses handed to them.

I am curious... does anyone know the ultimate date fag? The date when the 8 years is complete? What are we expecting by then? That would be a cool list to put together.

I'll start... by the end of the 8 years, the following will have happened:

1. Trump will have posted the "Look to Twitter" message.