so the occupying power would be XIDEN of course...what makes them "belligerent"?
the admin is supposed to be completely legal correct? at what point does the military say it is belligerent?
If those in the government were fraudulently elected (i.e. aided by foreign interference, drop #4821) they would be considered "belligerent," especially if they subverted the process knowingly. There are many Q drop dealing with this very issue.
What happens when the audit results show extensive manipulation? Consider that the "main stream" media pushed the "no evidence" narrative, knowingly? 18 USC chap. 115 applies. Now add in context from drop 34 regarding protest. The stage is set. Enjoy the show. ??
Read Q drop#34. Applys to current events. Protest and DC statehood. Put in context with 11.4
i really find the law of war aspects fascinating even though iunderstand maybe half...lol
any way this can be dumbed down for a civilian lol
https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNGhDehX/114-triggered/c/
Pay close attention to the End of the highlighted portion.
That pretty much says it all inre: DC becoming a state.
so the occupying power would be XIDEN of course...what makes them "belligerent"? the admin is supposed to be completely legal correct? at what point does the military say it is belligerent?
If those in the government were fraudulently elected (i.e. aided by foreign interference, drop #4821) they would be considered "belligerent," especially if they subverted the process knowingly. There are many Q drop dealing with this very issue.
What happens when the audit results show extensive manipulation? Consider that the "main stream" media pushed the "no evidence" narrative, knowingly? 18 USC chap. 115 applies. Now add in context from drop 34 regarding protest. The stage is set. Enjoy the show. ??