If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
YES i was just thinking about this its potentially a huge curveball... He says we had the most secure election in history (knowing about the watermarks)... the Dems all laud him as a hero for saying this and the republicans are pissed. I heard soooo many dems cite Christopher Krebs saying it was the most secure election. Now 6 months down the line we find out (possibly?) he was referring to the water marks and was actually spot on, right in time for the AZ audit to use watermarks to prove a ton of fraud.