If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
I was thinking if it was the UV reactive specs weaved into the paper, that would be obvious if it’s a whole ballot but also pretty obvious if you have a lot of already shredded ballots, just hold the shreds in UV and see if they’re reactive.
I sure hope this is how we bring all the damn cheating to light.