If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
I agree - I am not seeing any basis in fact for this 'watermark' probe. This is the kind of thing that can make this site look stupid and CTish by not sourcing it properly.