If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
Krebs is a crook. The only question is whether or not the white hats knew that before he was appointed to lead the newly created CISA. Either he snuck into that position and deliberately torpedoed efforts to safeguard elections, or else he was appointed to the position because the white hats knew he would try sabotage election security measures, and he was/is a primary target of a sting operation.