If the watermark thing is true, then was Krebs a good guy?
He repeatedly claimed the election was the most secure. He one of the experts used to dismiss the fraud allegations.
Was it a trap?
To get all the rethoric on the fraud out there, to have Krebs confirmed as the authority on the matter, and then make the audits happen?
That could be the point though. Establish him as an authority among the left, saying that the elections were the most secure. Get everyone to trust him, cite him, etc. Then all of a sudden, you reveal the fraud via watermarks and Krebs goes "See? The most secure election."