The series is actually pretty interesting. They present both sides of an argument, then show some evidence and have a believer and sceptic further the arguments. Then they ask the viewer if there is enough "proof" or if there was enough for the viewer to make a decision.
It is not nonsense. But,
If your 1 word comment was meant that the person could not possibly be the Q we are here discussing I do not argue against that.
What part is bullshit, the part that this person did not want to be immediately Identified, or the arguments presented?
Nonsense.
No outside comms.
I hope it did not come off as thinking this was a Com,
The series is actually pretty interesting. They present both sides of an argument, then show some evidence and have a believer and sceptic further the arguments. Then they ask the viewer if there is enough "proof" or if there was enough for the viewer to make a decision. It is not nonsense. But,
If your 1 word comment was meant that the person could not possibly be the Q we are here discussing I do not argue against that.
I just found it an interesting coincidence.
I had not seen this before so apologies if it has already been shared. The link for the series is, https://www.amazon.com/Demonic-Possession/dp/B08LY86N47/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Proof&qid=1619467128&s=instant-video&sr=1-1 And this person appears in episode 7, and 8 at least.
Backstory, My wife has listened to me talking about Q and said that he was in this series, and that I should watch it.
A very interesting coincidence that I am looking for when they filmed these episodes but so far it looks like 2020.