The series is actually pretty interesting. They present both sides of an argument, then show some evidence and have a believer and sceptic further the arguments. Then they ask the viewer if there is enough "proof" or if there was enough for the viewer to make a decision.
It is not nonsense. But,
If your 1 word comment was meant that the person could not possibly be the Q we are here discussing I do not argue against that.
The series is actually pretty interesting. They present both sides of an argument, then show some evidence and have a believer and sceptic further the arguments. Then they ask the viewer if there is enough "proof" or if there was enough for the viewer to make a decision. It is not nonsense. But,
If your 1 word comment was meant that the person could not possibly be the Q we are here discussing I do not argue against that.
I just found it an interesting coincidence.