Perkins Coie is a very connected law firm with a lot of power. I would not be surprised if they planted the lawyer on the plaintiff side. Apparently, she had "conveniently" not announced who she was until a few days ago so I guess the judge did not know.
I bet Perkins Coie waited to judge shop, before they activated their kill switch on the previous judge. Do not forget the general partners of Perkins Coie are all Podesta or Clinton lackies so we know they will use the law to subvert democracy.
Why didn't the person on the plaintiff team recuse and keep the judge? I bet the judge was pressured.
If they aren't being pressured, it's because they are already owned. Everything is on the line with this audit.
Perkins Coie is a very connected law firm with a lot of power. I would not be surprised if they planted the lawyer on the plaintiff side. Apparently, she had "conveniently" not announced who she was until a few days ago so I guess the judge did not know.
I bet Perkins Coie waited to judge shop, before they activated their kill switch on the previous judge. Do not forget the general partners of Perkins Coie are all Podesta or Clinton lackies so we know they will use the law to subvert democracy.