How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? - The Great Awakening

540

How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)? (media.greatawakening.win) ? B O O M ! ?

posted 3 years ago by nunyabz 3 years ago by nunyabz +540 / -0

71 comments download

71 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (71)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– DiveAndBait 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

You're smart, I will never learn.

I just heard of the raid and got totally triggered and I thought here we go, biden is taking Guliani out.

But yeah, introducing evidence....

permalink save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– MAGAngelo 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

But Rudy’s son is saying they left behind anything related to Hunter and the laptop.

Just what I’ve heard.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– nunyabz [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

That is most curious.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– ClitYeastwood 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Black hats would have went for the laptop first and destroy it ASAP. The fact that they're letting Rudy keep the all the evidence regarding Hunter makes me think that patriots are in control.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– Redpillgirlfrommars 0 points 3 years ago +2 / -2

Bro. It’s the fucking FBI. They’re worse than the KGB.

This is the kind of bullshit that makes me think this “trust the plan” thing IS a psy-op. So many fucking people here use mental gymnastics to convince themselves that absolute worst of the worst bad guys are actually the good guys in disguise.

Get that shit out of your head. The FBI is not good. They were NEVER good. This is not “patriots in control”, this is once again using government agencies to attack and bring down political opposition.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q