America First Legal (AFL) is seeking to launch a lawsuit against critical race theory (CRT), Stephen Miller, ex-adviser for former President Donald Trump, said.
“We’re also looking for plaintiffs—if we can find them—who are willing to stand up and file suit on critical race theory,” he said during an interview with Fox News.
Miller encouraged federal workers who are victims of CRT training to join this effort.
“Go to our website and tell us what happened to you,” he said.
The Epoch Times reached out to the White House and the Justice Department for comments
Critical race theory—which espouses the idea that race is not natural, but socially constructed to oppress and exploit people of color—is an offshoot of the Karl Marx-influenced critical theory social philosophy that was promoted by the Frankfurt School of thought.
Trump signed an executive order and banned CRT training in federal agencies in September 2020 with the White House describing it as “anti-American propaganda.”
However, this socialist ideology has been embraced by President Joe Biden and his administration. He reversed Trump’s September 2020 executive order right after he came into the White House and pushed CRT training on all fronts.
The Biden administration’s efforts triggered widespread pushback from federal and state Republican lawmakers, conservatives and related organizations, and parents.
In an April 27 letter, Reps. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) and Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) warned Biden’s Education Secretary Miguel Cardona about pushing CRT in the education system.
“Simply put, the teachings of Critical Race Theory want to reject the principles established in our Constitution and our individual God-given rights, and instead divide individuals into competing racial identity groups while doing little to help minority students advance,” they wrote in the letter.
AFL is a legal group founded by Trump-era officials to promote the American First agenda and push back against leftist radical movements in the United States.
Several high-profile officials from the Trump administration including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former acting U.S. Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, and former Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russ Vought joined the AFL board of directors along with Miller.
AFL launched a lawsuit against the Biden administration and joined other two lawsuits within one month of its establishment.
For decades, left-leaning lawyer organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have been pushing liberal agendas through legal fights in various courts. The ACLU reportedly raised just under $120 million in online donations and its members increased from 400,000 to 1.84 million within one and a half years after Trump won the 2016 presidential election.
However, legal efforts from the conservative side to push back the left-leaning agenda are relatively small and not at the same level.
Miller urged Republicans and conservatives to fight back instead of just focusing on “raising their families, living their lives, pursuing their dreams.”
“We have to save our country and fight back, just like they [the hardcore leftists] do, instead of fighting to destroy, we will fight to rescue,” he said.
I don't know who wrote that description of CRT, but respectfully, I don't think it's exactly right. The way CRT is formally defined is way more insane than that and far more derivative from plain critical theory (from which critical gender theory and others stem) than many people realize.
Basically, critical theory as a whole is a philosophy that espouses that "social problems are influenced and created more by social structures and cultural assumptions than by individual and psychological factors" (Wikipedia's Critical Theory article). In other words, people's actions are more influenced by society than by themselves (individual and psychological factors being the brain and any semblance or driver of free will).
It's easy to see how this is a relatively short leap to both nihilism and total disregard for individuality and personal responsibility. THIS is how they wage their arguments, derived from critical theory applied to "race" (in other words, critical race theory), that someone can be racist without being racist, or that math or anything else is racist.
Even Wikipedia admits in it's listing of criticisms that "A primary criticism of the theory is that it is anti-scientific, both for its lack of the use of the scientific method, and for its assertion that science is a tool used for oppression of marginalized groups of people."
And these are the same people that say "trust the science"!
It may seem like I'm being knit-picky here, but it is absolutely vital we know and understand our opposition as much as possible.
Some final (additional) notes;
Scientifically, "race" in the popular sense is not natural. It is not backed by any of the sciences. That isn't to say there aren't groups of people that have different commonalities in traits and genetics, it's just to say that the "races" commonly referred to do not match the genetics or other data of the situation. That said, the assumption that race was devised solely to exploit and oppress people of color is absurd; far more likely, race is merely a result of the human tendency to classify people based on observable factors.
If you want to read more about the science behind what I've described, go ahead and check out humanphenotypes.net, a quality website that contains and compares over a century of research into race, ethnicity, genetics, and human history in general. You can see a pre-globalization map of human phenotypes world-wide, as well as traits associated with those phenotypes, and descriptions of those traits alongside more detailed explanations of possible trait origins and evolutionary connections. You can also take a look at the comparisons between various researches and theories that have either held up or since been found inaccurate. It is some truly fascinating work!