US navy
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Are they peddling the UFO/space alien agenda here? Every time I turn around someone is pushing this narrative. For pete's sake, just parade the little green men out and be done with it. Puleeez. They've been here since at least 1947, if not a heck of a lot sooner than that.
Hi, LoneWulf. Regarding the aliens:
The aliens are quite real. Anything one can interact with is real and exists--in some form or another. The interesting question centers around what is their actual ontological nature, i.e., in what form do they actually exist.
The veridical answer to that question is that the aliens (and their precursor edition, the demons) are particular naturally-evolved parts of our own mind, i.e., they are particular subsets of our own consciousness: mostly the aliens/demons/etc. exist in our subconscious, but the highest levels of the elite occult societies have figured out over the ages various mental techniques to bring the aliens to the fore, to the conscious level. These aliens are the gods of old, the ones that required human sacrifice.
For much more on what is going on with the aliens/demons/spirit-guides/etc., see my following article:
On the more literal level of extraterrestrial life, it is likely that very simple forms of life exist throughout the universe. Yet the ancient alien hypothesis along with the idea of current intelligent extraterrestrial visitations has been pushed hard by certain sectors of the corporate media, and it is low-grade B-movie science-fiction schlock. A species powerful enough to cross stars--let alone galaxies--wouldn't come to Earth as humanoid creatures in ponderous starships, but rather would use extreme nanotechnology. If they were malicious and wanted to seize the Earth, they would fall to the ground as microscopic dust, infect our craniums, and we'd all be brain-dead before we hit the ground. It would be lights-out before any human even knew that anything had occurred.
Which is to say, if a species powerful and intelligent enough to cross stars were to land on Earth, where they would land is quite literally inside everyone's skulls.
Consult footnote 247 on pp. 103-104 of my following article regarding the globalist elite's New World Order alien deception agenda:
My foregoing article concerns physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals. However, it also analyzes the societal implications of said, particularly the implications of the exponential advancement of technology and hence also the coming radical life-extension technologies (i.e., transhumanism) in light of a world dominated by a callous oligarchy.
A lot of information here to digest. I'll give it a deep dive. Thanks, fren!
You're welcome, LoneWulf!
I read your essay, "Societal Sadomasochism," last night and have ruminated on it since then. I would like to present my thoughts in a spirit of debate and inquiry.
To give you some background on myself, I do not pretend to be knowledgeable about psychology, other than to say that I once read a college text on introductory psychology for the fun of it, lol. My degrees are in engineering and computers, so I'm not unfamiliar with the scientific and logical end of things. I am also a Christian and have done much study on my own in this area.
That being said, I must admit that your essay confuses me somewhat because it seems as though your arguments encompass both sides of the aisle. By that I mean some of your arguments stem from a Christian perspective and some of them don't. One cannot "have your cake and eat it, too." Christianity and evolution are at odds here, yet both are used to justify the conclusions.
I say this because I have recently been delving into Freemasonry. I have been on the fence with this organization for quite some time, vacillating between it being good vs. evil. After viewing the following video, I have finally concluded that deep down, it is satanic in nature:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZ4NTdSK5ac
While the lowest level members are most likely unaware of the true goals of the organization, at its highest levels there can be little doubt as to their motivations.
Which brings me to the issue of evolution, which you refer to in your article. Despite what the narrator in the above video states, there is no concrete proof that Charles Darwin was a Freemason. However, both his grandfather and father were:
http://expandourmind.com/2016/10/09/evolution-theory-fraud-2016/
It, therefore, seems safe to conclude that regardless of whether Darwin himself was a Freemason or not, he was most likely familiar with its teachings.
The above article on Darwin, as you will note, does not paint his theory of evolution in a very good light. It is not viewed here as trustworthy, but rather as deceptive, which is more in keeping with Freemasonry and satanism. At best, evolution is a theory. At worst, it is an intentional fraud. As a Christian, then, it is hard to put much faith in evolution, especially as there is nothing in Christianity that would suggest that man evolved:
Genesis
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.
Genesis would suggest that man has, from the very beginning, always been in the "image of God," which doesn't leave much room for evolution.
Unfortunately, this throws out many of the theories of psychology, as they are based on the concept of evolution.
Your opening statement, "The great age-old social problem that has faced mankind, and still very much does, is that most people do not love themselves, but instead actually hate themselves," gives me pause. Is it really that people hate themselves, or is it more likely that they hate the sin that resides within themselves?
Romans 3:23 - "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,"