CodeMonkeyZ think the auditors will be able to easily crack the password
(media.greatawakening.win)
? Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (115)
sorted by:
I get that. What I’m saying is how is it possible not to leave a trace of evidence of wrongdoing. Server logs can be rewritten, yes. But what executable was used? Now that I’m thinking about it, having a usb drive locally would allow an environment to create fraud without leaving any trace on the host server. Does that sound accurate? A stand alone machine can’t erase everything. Unless it’s straight up mission impossible style like another commenter mentioned.
I doubt the Dominion machines are "standard" because they are designed to commit crime and hiding evidence is only an engineering problem.
This is the gist of my reply to the commenter above; if the machine is being made for this specific purpose and the creators had access to virtually unlimited resources to et it done (Dominion/Gates have had a well-known relationship since 2015 and maybe earlier), then your point is exactly right.
They wouldn't be beholden to using any sort of "OS" as we know it, or even a codebase as we know them to get a machine to do exactly what these are needed to do, IMO.
I just hope they're as stupid as they are evil/misled.
“Planners” aren’t as smart as the commentators based on their actions
I speculate they are afraid of what will be found because otherwise if there was no trace they would allow the audit to silence discussion
My brain is broken...thanks for the reply. I’m just running through scenarios that would leave 0 footprint.
Yours and mine both. I’m seeing satellites.
Just like Tails Linux. https://tails.boum.org/