“Just because they had socialist in their name” That’s the whole of it, her entire argument, verbatim. I honestly don’t know what to do with her. The sad part is she only became political in 2016, and since then has turned into a filthy commie. I guess I need to thank her because my journey to unravel her false reality led me here.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
I appreciate the effort and the adherence to the definition which I find accurate. What I think needs mentioning is that in order to create such guardrails for society an absolute totalitarian and brutal society is necessary and inevitably created which goes against natural law. Human nature of commerce is both free and voluntary, from which the real danger of multi-generational monopolies manifest. So to me these things will always go in cycles of abundance followed by brutality, until we diminish our hubris and stop trying to control human nature. The failures of capitalism are actually the failures of morality. The failures of every other type of economic society is not the failure to control human nature, but attempting to do so in the first place.
Earlier in the chapter Quigley tries to explain that nazi Germany is not totalitarian. Like i said in my reply to my own comment. Its complete circular logic. Goes to show why Quigley is bill Clintons mentor.
Plus i just finished reading that section of the chapter so i figured i would share it.