Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

43
“One of the “fun facts” I remember from my photography classes was that “wide-angle lenses are not for portraits”. Of course, you can always experiment and photograph people with wider focal lengths, but the truth is – it does make them seem a bit weird in the photos...” (not bigger btw) (s23527.pcdn.co)
posted 5 years ago by LoobintheToobin 5 years ago by LoobintheToobin +43 / -0
13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

From this article in 2017: https://www.diyphotography.net/gif-explains-changing-focal-length-impacts-portrait/

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Lapstrake 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Wide angle can make something look huge in comparison to something of the same size next to it, if the something is a little bit closer to the camera lens.

Two Mugs:

https://files.catbox.moe/a4qt0a.jpg

Narrow Angle shot from several feet away:

https://files.catbox.moe/dcuj7j.jpg

In order to make the mugs take up about the same area in the picture, the lens must be much closer to the subject in Wide Angle. Therefore, one mug being a little closer makes a MUCH bigger difference in apparent size:

https://files.catbox.moe/v6brn9.jpg

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Can you do it with four mugs and get the same effect on both sides?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lapstrake 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Of course.

In order to make the mugs take up about 1/2 of the frame with a narrow angle lens, I have to be many feet away. So one mug being 3 inches closer to the lens doesn't make much difference.

With the wide angle lens, the camera must be less than 1 foot away in order to make the mugs take up 1/2 the frame. With the lens so close to the mugs, the difference in distance now is a big deal.

The apparent size effect has nothing to do with how far something is from the center. However, you will see more distortion of the shape as you get away from the center. That is because the image is going onto a flat image sensor in the camera, vs the curved image sensor in your eyeball.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I was hoping to see it in action. No sample this time? The old saying a picture is with a thousand words and in this case many updoots

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lapstrake 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Why would I care about fake internet points?

I think I made my point already.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Not to us visual learners, but if your content thats all that matters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lapstrake 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I think you've outed yourself, fool.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Hahahaha speak for yourself. Talk is cheap, produce the goods or else I have no reason to believe you.

https://youtu.be/XLUodac2BRU

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LoobintheToobin [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Additional information about lenses and how the math and distortion works.

https://files.catbox.moe/s02lu3.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/w8ti8t.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/uc0oqt.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/j0vppq.jpeg https://files.catbox.moe/sa66hu.jpeg

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Watcher 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

OK, but strictly it is not the lens's fault. It is the fault of the photographer for standing too close.

If you stand 20' away from someone then 1' either way makes very little difference. On the other hand, if you stand 1' away then an extra foot makes everything half as big. Our brain and eyes coordinate to divine the truth of the situation in real life but when it is presented as a flat image that takes in more than we could take in in a single glance then we become fooled.

To put that another way, if you have two objects of the same height and you place one a foot from the lens and the other one two feet from the lens then that second object will appear to be half as big as the first one.

If you get close enough to people's faces you can give anyone a huge nose while their ears will disappear round the corner and that is the same whether you use a camera lens or your own eyes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lapstrake 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Wide angle definitely can make people appear freakishly large if they are closer to the lens than the person next to them.

This can be easily demonstrated.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– muhqtardtho 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Now start looking at the straight lines in the background of all the pov porn you watch. You think they like banging on those odd shaped pieces of furniture?

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy